Nick Coghlan wrote:
A toy example,
that isn't obviously broken at first glance, but in fact fails when
close() is called:
Okay, you've convinced me. I'll consider it to be correct
behaviour and update my expected yield-from test results
accordingly.
--
Greg
___
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
It only happens if you call close() explicitly:
Well, that's only because the exception is being ignored and
you're not getting a traceback at all.
If you arrange to get a traceback, the same thing happens.
import traceback as tb
def g():
try:
try:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> I don't see it as an implementation detail - it's part of the spec of
>> generator finalisation in PEP 342
>
> It doesn't seem like something you need to know in this
> situation, though. All it tells you is that the fina
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:01:32 +1200
Greg Ewing wrote:
> While updating my yield-from impementation for Python
> 3.1.2, I came across a quirk in the way that the new
> exception chaining feature interacts with generators.
>
> If you close() a generator, and it raises an exception
> inside a finally
Nick Coghlan wrote:
I don't see it as an implementation detail - it's part of the spec of
generator finalisation in PEP 342
It doesn't seem like something you need to know in this
situation, though. All it tells you is that the finalisation
is happening because the generator is being closed ra
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> While updating my yield-from impementation for Python
> 3.1.2, I came across a quirk in the way that the new
> exception chaining feature interacts with generators.
>
> If you close() a generator, and it raises an exception
> inside a finally cl
