Jim Jewett wrote:
> (6) Mark Hammond suggests that it might be easier to
> replace the interactive portions of python based on the
> "code" module. matplotlib suggests using ipython
> instead of standard python for similar reasons.
>
> If that is really the simplest answer (and telling users
>
Jim Jewett wrote:
> (6) Mark Hammond suggests that it might be easier to
> replace the interactive portions of python based on the
> "code" module. matplotlib suggests using ipython
> instead of standard python for similar reasons.
>
> If that is really the simplest answer (and telling users
> w
I think this is an excellent summary of the discussion so far. Probably
clearer than my own posts.
Thanks, Jim!
--Michiel.
Jim Jewett wrote:
>There has been enough misunderstanding in this thread
>that the summarizers are going to have trouble. So I'm
>posting this draft in hopes of clarificat
