Brett> While this is going to require a PEP (which I am willing to
Brett> write), the discussion of adding pysqlite has brought forth some
Brett> discussion on naming and packaging in the stdlub. Perhaps it's
Brett> time to start discussing the Great Library Reorganization that
Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't have a problem with reorganising the standard library, but
> what's the motivation for moving everything under a new root? Is it
> just to allow people to unambigiously get hold of something from the
> stdlib, rather than following the normal sea
On 3/29/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/29/06, Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 March 2006 08:39, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > > Here is a place I think we can take a queue from Java. I think we
> > > should have a root package, 'py', and then have subpack
On Thursday 30 March 2006 10:31, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > I don't have a problem with reorganising the standard library,
> > but what's the motivation for moving everything under a new root?
> > Is it just to allow people to unambigiously get hold of something
> > from the stdlib, rather than follow
On 3/29/06, Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 30 March 2006 08:39, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > Here is a place I think we can take a queue from Java. I think we
> > should have a root package, 'py', and then have subpackages within
> > that.
>
> org.python.stdlib, surely?
>
> I
On Thursday 30 March 2006 08:39, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Here is a place I think we can take a queue from Java. I think we
> should have a root package, 'py', and then have subpackages within
> that.
org.python.stdlib, surely?
I don't have a problem with reorganising the standard library, but
Brett Cannon wrote:
> Here is a place I think we can take a queue from Java. I think we
> should have a root package, 'py', and then have subpackages within
> that
At one point Tim Peters and I thought the right spot for python
equivalents of C-coded modules belonged in package "py". Would
'
On 3/29/06, Dennis Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not quite on the same topic, but perhaps it belong there. I think most of
> use use both the stdlib and some selection of other libraries
> (MySQL-Python, ReportLab Toolkit, PyChart, and PyXML, for example). These
> libraries have to be ma
Brett Cannon wrote:
> > Wouldn't the newly founded python-3000 mailing list be the perfect place
> > for such major changes?
>
> If you go back and look at Guido's Python 3000 Process email he said
> that the change could occur in 2.6 and then be done for 3000.
> Renaming modules is not that hard
Not quite on the same topic, but perhaps it belong there. I think most of
use use both the stdlib and some selection of other libraries
(MySQL-Python, ReportLab Toolkit, PyChart, and PyXML, for example). These
libraries have to be managed independently and installed independently.
It would be n
On 3/29/06, Gerhard Häring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Brett Cannon wrote:
> > While this is going to require a PEP (which I am willing to write),
> > the discussion of adding pysqlite has brought forth some discussion on
> > naming and packaging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brett Cannon wrote:
> While this is going to require a PEP (which I am willing to write),
> the discussion of adding pysqlite has brought forth some discussion on
> naming and packaging in the stdlub. Perhaps it's time to start
> discussing the Great
12 matches
Mail list logo
