Can we get this discussion off python-dev? It's not going to change,
and this is not the forum to express your disagreement.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
>> On 13/04/13 20:30, Ben Finney wrote:
>> > "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes:
>> >> A failur
Ben Finney writes:
> As it currently stands, the Contributor Agreement grants special
> legal privilege in the work (the power to unilaterally re-license
> the work) to the PSF.
"I hate to disagree, Sir, but that turns out to be incorrect."[0]
First, it's not the Contributor Agreement, it's t
On 4/15/2013 12:15 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Steven D'Aprano writes:
On 13/04/13 20:30, Ben Finney wrote:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" writes:
A failure to sign the CLA is already a decision not to contribute
to the distribution
As someone who cannot in good faith sign the CLA, that
characterisation
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> On 13/04/13 20:30, Ben Finney wrote:
> > "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes:
> >> A failure to sign the CLA is already a decision not to contribute
> >> to the distribution
> >
> > As someone who cannot in good faith sign the CLA, that
> > characterisation is far from accurat
On 13/04/13 20:30, Ben Finney wrote:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" writes:
Mark Lawrence writes:
> People already use the bug tracker as an excuse not to contribute,
> wouldn't this requirement make the situation worse?
A failure to sign the CLA is already a decision not to contribute to
the dis
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes:
>
>> Mark Lawrence writes:
>>
>> > People already use the bug tracker as an excuse not to contribute,
>> > wouldn't this requirement make the situation worse?
>>
>> A failure to sign the CLA is already a decision
