On 1/12/07, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
> > I thinking that the 3.0.X version be considered a try it out (alpha)
> > release to
> > generate plenty of feed back, and the 3.1.X version be the first version
> > meant
> > for actual development use.
>
> +1 for this
Ron Adam wrote:
> I thinking that the 3.0.X version be considered a try it out (alpha) release
> to
> generate plenty of feed back, and the 3.1.X version be the first version
> meant
> for actual development use.
+1 for this approach.
I think it's very clear, and everybody will understand it
