On 12/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I then proposed the even wackier idea to simply allow all currently
> >> unsupported iterables (sets and arrays seem the most obvious
> >> candidates to me) to be marshalled as lists
>
> Raymond> Doesn't the appropriate
>> I then proposed the even wackier idea to simply allow all currently
>> unsupported iterables (sets and arrays seem the most obvious
>> candidates to me) to be marshalled as lists
Raymond> Doesn't the appropriate conversion depend on the contract
Raymond> between the sender
[Skip]
> I then proposed the
> even wackier idea to simply allow all currently unsupported iterables
> (sets
> and arrays seem the most obvious candidates to me) to be marshalled as
> lists
Doesn't the appropriate conversion depend on the contract between the
sender and receiver (i.e. an array of
