> My perception is that making someone nosy on an issue is preferred to
> assigning it to them (allowing them to assign it to themselves if they
> think that is appropriate), unless the issue is of higher priority or
> someone actively working on the issue really needs the other person's
> input i
R. David Murray wrote:
> Well, in my recent experience there are two things the assignee gets
> used for. The first is someone claiming an issue, saying, in effect,
> I'm going to work this issue until it is closed. The other is to do
> exactly what Sean did, assign it to the next person whose de
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:23:00 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 4/26/2010 2:12 AM, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> > Then we went on to issue 5575 and read through it. In reading this one
> > to determine the priority, it was clear that the ball was back in
> > Collin's court, so I showed tha
