Re: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)

2015-05-22 Thread Petr Viktorin
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Eric Snow wrote: > Hi all, > > After extended discussion over the last several months on import-sig, > the resulting proposal for multi-phase (PEP 451) extension module > initialization has finalized. The resulting PEP provides a clean, > straight-forward, and ba

Re: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)

2015-05-22 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 23 May 2015 07:45, "Eric Snow" wrote: > > Hi all, > > After extended discussion over the last several months on import-sig, > the resulting proposal for multi-phase (PEP 451) extension module > initialization has finalized. The resulting PEP provides a clean, > straight-forward, and backward-c

Re: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)

2015-05-22 Thread Raymond Hettinger
> On May 22, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Congrats! Many thanks to all who contributed. > > On May 22, 2015 2:45 PM, "Eric Snow" wrote: > Hi all, > > After extended discussion over the last several months on import-sig, > the resulting proposal for multi-phase (PEP 451) exten

Re: [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)

2015-05-22 Thread Guido van Rossum
Congrats! Many thanks to all who contributed. On May 22, 2015 2:45 PM, "Eric Snow" wrote: > Hi all, > > After extended discussion over the last several months on import-sig, > the resulting proposal for multi-phase (PEP 451) extension module > initialization has finalized. The resulting PEP prov