On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:36:39 -0700
"fwierzbi...@gmail.com" wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Simon Cross > wrote:
>
> > Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to
> > alternative Python implementations.
>
> I suspect it's too hard. I remember seeing some work on "any
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Simon Cross wrote:
> Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to
> alternative Python implementations.
I suspect it's too hard. I remember seeing some work on "anygui.py" that
looked like an attempt to make these sorts of things work across var
Yes, it would probably make more sense to split the editor and shell
processes as many Python IDEs do, with IDLE running in CPython and the
user's computation running in the chosen interpreter.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Antoine P
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:33:38 +0200
> Simon Cross wrote:
>
>> Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to
>> alternative Python implementations.
>
> Why?
I don't think it's worth discussing - tkinter does not work on any
o
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:33:38 +0200
Simon Cross wrote:
> Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to
> alternative Python implementations.
Why?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to
alternative Python implementations.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/pyt
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> I am accepting Todd Rovito's and Terry Reedy's PEP 434, officially
>> declaring IDLE to be an application bundled with Python, with the
>> contents of "Lib/idlelib" exempt from th
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> Does that mean that mainstream idle development should move out of the
> python tree?
No the acceptance of PEP-434 does not mean IDLE development should move out
of the python tree. The acceptance of PEP-434 means that the restrictio
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I am accepting Todd Rovito's and Terry Reedy's PEP 434, officially
> declaring IDLE to be an application bundled with Python, with the
> contents of "Lib/idlelib" exempt from the usual "no new features in
> maintenance releases" rule.
>
> As s
