On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 08:58, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > Antoine Pitrou, 02.04.2012 13:50:
> >> On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:44:00 -0500
> >> Brian Curtin wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 17:31, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curt
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou, 02.04.2012 13:50:
>> On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:44:00 -0500
>> Brian Curtin wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 17:31, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curtin wrote:
> For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causi
On Apr 03, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>I don't think Barry still uses bzr, and who ever used git to manage their
>patches against the CPython repo?
I still use bzr, but not currently for Python development. I just use the
standard hg repo. I'd like to go back to it though once the
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:44:32 +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 07:43:20 +1000
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > > That said, these files will always be outdated, so we might as well
> > > remove them so that at least git / bzr
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 07:43:20 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > That said, these files will always be outdated, so we might as well
> > remove them so that at least git / bzr users don't get confused.
>
> Given that they were originally *added*
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> That said, these files will always be outdated, so we might as well
> remove them so that at least git / bzr users don't get confused.
Given that they were originally *added* by core devs that are (or
were) using git/bzr for their own local
On 4/2/2012 11:03 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> That said, these files will always be outdated, so we might as well
>> remove them so that at least git / bzr users don't get confused.
>
> Apologies for what may be a stupid suggestion, but is
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> That said, these files will always be outdated, so we might as well
> remove them so that at least git / bzr users don't get confused.
Apologies for what may be a stupid suggestion, but is it possible to
write a script that generates .gitign
Antoine Pitrou, 02.04.2012 13:50:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:44:00 -0500
> Brian Curtin wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 17:31, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>>> On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curtin wrote:
For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
>>>
>>>
>>> No, but wrong .gitignore causes
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:44:00 -0500
Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 17:31, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> > On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curtin wrote:
> >>
> >> For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
> >
> >
> > No, but wrong .gitignore causes issues with git repo obtained v
On 2.4.2012 00:52, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Please file a bug to get this reviewed and checked in.
OK, I don't agree with the reasoning, but I willingly submit to BDFL ;)
http://bugs.python.org/issue14472
Matěj
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@
On 2.4.2012 05:26, Scott Dial wrote:
Create an issue on the bug tracker. In the meantime, you can either
commit the change to your clone, or you can put your ignores into
.git/info/exclude. No reason to be so sore about it, since Git lets you
have your own ignore file without requiring it be a tr
On 02/04/2012 07:03, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Am 02.04.2012 00:31, schrieb Matěj Cepl:
On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curtin wrote:
For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
No, but wrong .gitignore causes issues with git repo obtained via
hg-fast-import. If it is meant as an
Am 02.04.2012 00:31, schrieb Matěj Cepl:
> On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curtin wrote:
>> For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
>
> No, but wrong .gitignore causes issues with git repo obtained via
> hg-fast-import. If it is meant as an intentional sabotage of using git
> (and
On 3/30/2012 11:00 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> It is even worse, that (understandingly) .{bzr,git}ignore are apparently
> poorly maintained, so in order to get an equivalent of .hgignore in
> .gitignore, one has to apply the attached patch.
Create an issue on the bug tracker. In the meantime, you can
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curtin wrote:
>>
>> For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
>
>
> No, but wrong .gitignore causes issues with git repo obtained via
> hg-fast-import. If it is meant as an intentional sabotage of us
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 17:31, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curtin wrote:
>>
>> For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
>
>
> No, but wrong .gitignore causes issues with git repo obtained via
> hg-fast-import. If it is meant as an intentional sabotage of usin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/01/2012 06:31 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curtin wrote:
>> For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
>
> No, but wrong .gitignore causes issues with git repo obtained via
> hg-fast-import. If it is mea
On 1.4.2012 23:46, Brian Curtin wrote:
For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
No, but wrong .gitignore causes issues with git repo obtained via
hg-fast-import. If it is meant as an intentional sabotage of using git
(and bzr) for cpython, then that's the only explanati
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Why does HG cpython repo contains .{bzr,git}ignore at all?
So that when people switch between repo software the set of ignored
files remains constant. While the "official" repo isn't going to
switch any time soon, various developers for various
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:00, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Why does HG cpython repo contains .{bzr,git}ignore at all?
> IMHO, all .*ignore files should be strictly repository dependent and they
> should not be mixed together.
For what reason? Are the git or bzr files causing issues on HG?
___
21 matches
Mail list logo
