On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 at 10:58 Philipp A. wrote:
> Brett Cannon schrieb am Mi., 17. Aug. 2016 um
> 19:15 Uhr:
>
>> Please don't cross-post as it means anyone replying to your email will
>> now split the conversation as not everyone will be subscribed to all of the
>> mailing lists you sent this to
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Philipp A. wrote:
> i’ll patiently await clarification about this, and again: sorry for
> sounding demanding :(
>
The explanation is honestly that the current approach is the most
straightforward for the implementation (it's pretty hard to intercept the
string l
Brett Cannon schrieb am Mi., 17. Aug. 2016 um 19:15 Uhr:
> Please don't cross-post as it means anyone replying to your email will now
> split the conversation as not everyone will be subscribed to all of the
> mailing lists you sent this to. I have stripped out all but python-dev for
> my reply.
Please don't cross-post as it means anyone replying to your email will now
split the conversation as not everyone will be subscribed to all of the
mailing lists you sent this to. I have stripped out all but python-dev for
my reply.
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 at 09:47 Philipp A. wrote:
> hi, i already p
hi, i already posted in python-ideas, but i got no replies, so i’ll post
here:
in essence i think interpreting escape sequences in f-literals is a *very*
bad idea, mainly because i think it’s fundamental that syntax highlighters
can highlight code as code.
so they should highlight the code parts
