On Oct 20, 2010, at 05:50 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>Wow, that's very interesting. Whilst a lot of people on this list will have
>an interest in knowing about this it still isn't the right list for
>discussing it. The python-porting list *is* an entirely appropriate list and
>it would be great to s
On 20/10/2010 17:43, David Malcolm wrote:
(my apologies, if necessary, for top-posting)
FWIW Neal asked about this on Fedora's development mailing list as well:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-October/144535.html
If I'm reading:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/fpconst/
corre
(my apologies, if necessary, for top-posting)
FWIW Neal asked about this on Fedora's development mailing list as well:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-October/144535.html
If I'm reading:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/fpconst/
correctly, that project hasn't had an upstream upda
fpconst developers?
2010/10/19 Neal Becker :
> Where should I send this patch?
>
> diff -u fpconst-0.7.2/fpconst.py fpconst-0.7.2.new/fpconst.py
> --- fpconst-0.7.2/fpconst.py 2005-02-24 12:42:03.0 -0500
> +++ fpconst-0.7.2.new/fpconst.py 2010-10-19 20:55:07.407765664 -0400
> @@
