Re: [Python-Dev] [Web-SIG] wsgiref doc draft; reviews/patches wanted

2006-06-10 Thread Joe Gregorio
On 6/9/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >4. I believe the order of submodules presented is important and think that > >they should be listed with 'handlers' and 'simple_server' first: > > I agree that the order is important, but I intentionally chose the current > order to be a g

Re: [Python-Dev] [Web-SIG] wsgiref doc draft; reviews/patches wanted

2006-06-09 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 02:56 PM 6/7/2006 -0400, Joe Gregorio wrote: >Phillip, > >1. It's not really clear from the abstract 'what' this library >provides. You might want >to consider moving the text from 1.1 up to the same level as the abstract. Done. >2. In section 1.1 you might want to consider dropping the

Re: [Python-Dev] [Web-SIG] wsgiref doc draft; reviews/patches wanted

2006-06-08 Thread Joe Gregorio
Phillip, 1. It's not really clear from the abstract 'what' this library provides. You might want to consider moving the text from 1.1 up to the same level as the abstract. 2. In section 1.1 you might want to consider dropping the sentence: "Only authors of web servers and programming fram