* Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-16 01:06:59]:
> > * Coding question: Without retyping the bunch of code again in the
> > BaseResult, would is the possible to call parse_qs/parse_qsl function on
> > self.query and provide the result? Basically, what would be a good of
> > doin
On Saturday 16 June 2007, O.R.Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> The urlparse will cotain parse_qs and parse_qsl takes the query string
> (not url) and with optional arguments keep_blank_values and strict_parsing
> (same as cgi).
>
> http://deadbeefbabe.org/paste/5154
Looks good.
> > It may be conven
* Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-13 22:42:21]:
> I see no reason to incorporate the URL splitting into the function; the
> existing function signatures for cgi.parse_qs and cgi.parse_qsl are
> sufficient.
Thanks for the comments, Fred. I understand, that having the signatures o
On Tuesday 12 June 2007, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> This mail is a request for comments on changes to urlparse module. We
> understand that urlparse returns the 'complete query' value as the query
> component and does not
> provide the facilities to separate the query components. User will have t
* Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-13 19:27:24]:
> > a) import cgi and call cgi module's query_ps. [circular imports]
>
> or
>
> > b) Implement a stand alone query parsing facility in urlparse *AS IN*
> > cgi module.
>
> Assuming (b), please remove the (code for the) parsing from the
