Nick Coghlan wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
and this could give some people a mis-impression, most likely negative,
as to the magnitude and nature of the change. Most of the code I am now
writing would, I believe, run with 2.5 except for print(..., file=xxx).
And I know that there was concern for b
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 13:07, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
>> and this could give some people a mis-impression, most likely negative,
>> as to the magnitude and nature of the change. Most of the code I am now
>> writing would, I believe, run with 2.5 except for prin
Terry Reedy wrote:
> and this could give some people a mis-impression, most likely negative,
> as to the magnitude and nature of the change. Most of the code I am now
> writing would, I believe, run with 2.5 except for print(..., file=xxx).
> And I know that there was concern for backward compati
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Python 3.0 (a.k.a. "Python 3000" or "Py3k") represents a major milestone in
Python's history, and was nearly three years in the making. This is a new
version of the language that is incompatible with the 2.x line of releases,
I think this
while remaining true to BDFL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 3, 2008, at 9:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Thanks so much for seeing this one through, Barry and co! Champagne!!!
Now if only I could go on vacation. :)
- -Barry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSTc/
Thanks so much for seeing this one through, Barry and co! Champagne!!!
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I am
> happy to announce the relea
