On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> The bindings cannot go changing header contents to their liking, so any
> canonicalization would have to go into rpm proper, the build-side of things
> to be exact so the runtime doesn't have to care. Requiring rpm to fiddle
> with encoding
On 03/22/2011 03:06 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
[CCing Panu Matilainen, the maintainer of rpm, or, at least rpm 4.*,
which is what all major distributions are using AIUI]
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 10:50 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Am 21.03.2011 07:37, schrieb Prashant Kumar:
Hello,
My name i
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:06:22PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> Other ideas that occur:
> - does rpmlint check for encoding yet?
> - what to do e.g. about canonicalization? What happens if one rpm
> provide a feature named "café" (where the "é" is U+00E9) and another rpm
> requires a featu
[CCing Panu Matilainen, the maintainer of rpm, or, at least rpm 4.*,
which is what all major distributions are using AIUI]
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 10:50 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 21.03.2011 07:37, schrieb Prashant Kumar:
> > Hello,
> > My name is Prashant Kumar and I've worked on por
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:50 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 21.03.2011 07:37, schrieb Prashant Kumar:
>> Hello,
>> My name is Prashant Kumar and I've worked on porting few python
>> libraries(distutils2, configobj) and I've been looking at the ideas
>> list for GSoC for a project related t
Am 21.03.2011 07:37, schrieb Prashant Kumar:
> Hello,
> My name is Prashant Kumar and I've worked on porting few python
> libraries(distutils2, configobj) and I've been looking at the ideas
> list for GSoC for a project related to porting.
>
> I came across [1] and found it interesting.
