On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 03:31:59PM -0500, Ron Adam wrote:
> - The html syntax highlighters. (Pydoc can use those)
I have a patch on the docutils patch tracker that does this. Code is
probably of a rather bad quality, but it outputs LaTeX and HTML. If we
can work together to improve this patc
Martin Blais wrote:
> e.g. are you still marking classes as classes
> and functions as functions in the ReST source
It seems so (modulo XXX's and TODO's in Georg's implementation, probably
^_^) -- all of the pages have "show source" links, so you can see for
yourself. I'm not an expert with the
On 5/19/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Waiting for comments!
Awesome, Georg! Wow. Nice work.
Seems like this has been a long time comin', and I bet others have
been working away "in secret" on similar projects. I hope you keep
running with it until it gets hijacked int
[Georg Brandl]
> The highlighting is actually done with Pygments, which cannot be
> included in the stdlib as-is. Perhaps a stripped-down version?
No need to; we can just fall back to no syntax highlighting if Pygments
is not installed on the user's system.
[Gael Varoquaux]
>> - The html synt
Georg Brandl wrote:
> over the last few weeks I've hacked on a new approach to Python's
> documentation.
> As Python already has an excellent documentation framework, the docutils,
> with a
> readable yet extendable markup format, reST, I thought that it should be
> possible to use those instead
