On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Le Monday 15 December 2008 19:50:42 Josiah Carlson, vous avez écrit :
>> Would anyone mind terribly if I backported a version of:
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue4501 to 2.4 and 2.5?
>
> First the patch have be reviewed and at least applied t
Le Monday 15 December 2008 19:50:42 Josiah Carlson, vous avez écrit :
> Would anyone mind terribly if I backported a version of:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue4501 to 2.4 and 2.5?
First the patch have be reviewed and at least applied to trunk :-)
Can you give an short example to describe the bug?
> Would anyone mind terribly if I backported a version of:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue4501 to 2.4 and 2.5?
Yes, I would. These branches are frozen right now until the
final release is made. Afterwards, only security-critical patches
are allowed, which this one is not, AFAICT.
> It fixes some s
Would anyone mind terribly if I backported a version of:
http://bugs.python.org/issue4501 to 2.4 and 2.5?
It fixes some strange duplicate data issues on poll() with packets
with a nonstandard flag set.
- Josiah
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:55 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Christian Heimes wrote:
Christian Heimes wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
>> 2.5.3 is the last bug fix release of Python 2.5. Future 2.5.x releases
>> will only include security fixes. According to the release notes, over
>> 100 bugs and patches have been addressed since Python 2.5.1, many of
>
Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
> 2.5.3 is the last bug fix release of Python 2.5. Future 2.5.x releases
> will only include security fixes. According to the release notes, over
> 100 bugs and patches have been addressed since Python 2.5.1, many of
