> I fixed recently some bugs in distutils. Should I also fix them in the
> packaging module, or are both modules already "synchronized"?
I ported some fixes, especially in sysconfig; for distutils, I have a
number of them marked for backport in the bug tracker (distutils2
component) or in personal
Le 17/05/2011 18:42, Christian Heimes a écrit :
> A good place for a local sysconfig.cfg could be the user's stdlib
> directory (e.g. ~/.local/lib/python3.2/sysconfig.cfg).
I don’t think so. See http://bugs.python.org/issue7175 and
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/103011.ht
In article ,
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Ned Deily wrote:
> > Just to be clear: what about for the build of the interpreter itself,
> > i.e. its setup.py for the standard library extension modules? Will the
> > existing distutils code continue to be used for that? [...
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Ned Deily wrote:
...
> Just to be clear: what about for the build of the interpreter itself,
> i.e. its setup.py for the standard library extension modules? Will the
> existing distutils code continue to be used for that? Or is it being
> replaced by code in pack
In article ,
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
> > Le mardi 17 mai 2011 à 17:36 +0200, Tarek Ziadé a écrit :
> >> - addition of Lib/packaging
> >> - addition of test/test_packaging.py
> >> - changes in Lib/sysconfig.py
> >> - addition of Lib/sysconfig
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 17.05.2011 17:36, schrieb Tarek Ziadé:
>> The next change I have planned is to allow several levels of
>> configuration, like distutils.cfg does. sysconfig.py will look for a
>> sysconfig.cfg file in these places:
>>
>> 1. the current w
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Le mardi 17 mai 2011 à 17:36 +0200, Tarek Ziadé a écrit :
>> - addition of Lib/packaging
>> - addition of test/test_packaging.py
>> - changes in Lib/sysconfig.py
>> - addition of Lib/sysconfig.cfg
>
> Does setup.py continue to use the "old"
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
...
>> 1. the current working directory -- so can be potentially included in
>> a project source release
>
> Does this mean that python behaves differently when there happens to be a
> sysconfig.cfg file in the current working directory? Tha
Le mardi 17 mai 2011 à 17:36 +0200, Tarek Ziadé a écrit :
> - addition of Lib/packaging
> - addition of test/test_packaging.py
> - changes in Lib/sysconfig.py
> - addition of Lib/sysconfig.cfg
Does setup.py continue to use the "old" distutils module?
I fixed recently some bugs in distutils. Shoul
On 17 May, 2011, at 17:36, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am about to merge packaging in the stdlib, and we will continue our
> work there :)
>
> The impact is:
>
> - addition of Lib/packaging
> - addition of test/test_packaging.py
> - changes in Lib/sysconfig.py
> - addition of Lib/sysconfi
Am 17.05.2011 17:36, schrieb Tarek Ziadé:
> The next change I have planned is to allow several levels of
> configuration, like distutils.cfg does. sysconfig.py will look for a
> sysconfig.cfg file in these places:
>
> 1. the current working directory -- so can be potentially included in
> a projec
11 matches
Mail list logo
