On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 09:40, Michael Chermside wrote:
> Barry writes:
> > As an experiment, I just added a PEP topic to the python-checkins
> > mailing list. You could subscribe to this list and just select the PEP
> > topic (which matches the regex "PEP" in the Subject header or first few
> > lin
Barry writes:
> As an experiment, I just added a PEP topic to the python-checkins
> mailing list. You could subscribe to this list and just select the PEP
> topic (which matches the regex "PEP" in the Subject header or first few
> lines of the body).
>
> Give it a shot and let's see if that does t
Barry Warsaw wrote:
Please do (he says, hoping it works :).
Speaking of which. . . care to poke PEP 0 or one of the other PEP's? There's
probably a couple of PEP's which could be moved from 'Open' to 'Accepted' or
'Accepted' to 'Implemented' to try it out.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EM
Batista, Facundo wrote:
[Barry Warsaw]
> As an experiment, I just added a PEP topic to the python-checkins
> mailing list. You could subscribe to this list and just select the PEP
> topic (which matches the regex "PEP" in the Subject header or first few
> lines of the body).
>
> Give it a sh
Title: RE: [Python-Dev] Re: Subscribing to PEP updates
[Barry Warsaw]
> As an experiment, I just added a PEP topic to the python-checkins
> mailing list. You could subscribe to this list and just select the PEP
> topic (which matches the regex "PEP" in the Subject
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 10:05, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > As an experiment, I just added a PEP topic to the python-checkins
> > mailing list. You could subscribe to this list and just select the PEP
> > topic (which matches the regex "PEP" in the Subject header or first few
> > li
Barry Warsaw wrote:
As an experiment, I just added a PEP topic to the python-checkins
mailing list. You could subscribe to this list and just select the PEP
topic (which matches the regex "PEP" in the Subject header or first few
lines of the body).
Give it a shot and let's see if that does the tri
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 11:33, Chermside, Michael wrote:
> > Why not just subscribe to
> > python-checkins and filter out everything *but* nondist/peps?
>
> But there are lots of people who might be interested in
> following PEP updates but not other checkins. Pretty
> much anyone who considers them
> Why not just subscribe to
> python-checkins and filter out everything *but* nondist/peps?
But there are lots of people who might be interested in
following PEP updates but not other checkins. Pretty
much anyone who considers themselves a "user" of Python
not a developer. Perhaps they don't even
