Thomas Wouters wrote:
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0204/
>
> (If you must really discuss this, which would probably be futile and
> senseless, please do it on python-3000 only.)
Certainly looks very similar. PEP-204 demands change in a parser
and considers a new design as replacement to r
On 6/13/06, Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You were bothered yet with function xrange ? :) I suggest to replace it.http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0204/ (If you must really discuss this, which would probably be futile and senseless, please do it on python-3000 only.)
-- Thomas
You were bothered yet with function xrange ? :) I suggest to replace it.
-
for i in xrange(100): pass
vs.
for i in int[:100]: pass
-
-
for i
