Neal Norwitz wrote:
> I've profiled various combinations. Here are the various results
> normalized doing xrange(0, 1e6, 1):
>
> Run on all integer (32-bit) values for start, step, end:
> C xrange and iter: 1
> Py xrange w/C iter: 1
in real life, loops are a lot shorter than that.
if you take
On 8/24/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/24/06, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I've been working on enhancing xrange and there are a bunch of issues> to consider. I've got pretty much complete implementations in both C
> and Python. Currently xrange is 2 objects: ra
On 8/24/06, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been working on enhancing xrange and there are a bunch of issues
> to consider. I've got pretty much complete implementations in both C
> and Python. Currently xrange is 2 objects: range and the iter.
> These only work on C longs. Here'
I've been working on enhancing xrange and there are a bunch of issues
to consider. I've got pretty much complete implementations in both C
and Python. Currently xrange is 2 objects: range and the iter.
These only work on C longs. Here's what I propose:
2.6:
* Add deprecation warning if a floa
