On 5/28/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brett Cannon schrieb:
> Unfortunately the pre-commit hook
> does not specify what line a change was made on so I have no clue where
> it is failing (maybe this should be added?).
It creates a reindent.Reindenter on the new contents, then
Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
>> As I said before, you don't really need that when you can (and should!) just
>> run
>> reindent.py over the source file yourself, not care about any diffs and just
>> resubmit.
>
> Right. So I withdraw my offer to do anything about the hook.
I think printing something
> As I said before, you don't really need that when you can (and should!) just
> run
> reindent.py over the source file yourself, not care about any diffs and just
> resubmit.
Right. So I withdraw my offer to do anything about the hook.
Regards,
Martin
___
Scott Dial schrieb:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> Brett Cannon schrieb:
>>> Unfortunately the pre-commit hook
>>> does not specify what line a change was made on so I have no clue where
>>> it is failing (maybe this should be added?).
>>
>> It creates a reindent.Reindenter on the new contents, then
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Brett Cannon schrieb:
>> Unfortunately the pre-commit hook
>> does not specify what line a change was made on so I have no clue where
>> it is failing (maybe this should be added?).
>
> It creates a reindent.Reindenter on the new contents, then invokes
> .run() on it, and
Brett Cannon schrieb:
> Unfortunately the pre-commit hook
> does not specify what line a change was made on so I have no clue where
> it is failing (maybe this should be added?).
It creates a reindent.Reindenter on the new contents, then invokes
.run() on it, and complains if that returns true. If
On 5/26/07, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/26/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/25/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> > > On 5/25/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> In my bcannon-objcap branch I am trying to
On 5/26/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/25/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> > > On 5/25/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> In my bcannon-objcap branch I am trying to check in a change that
> involves a
> > >> soft symlink
On 5/25/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> On 5/25/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In my bcannon-objcap branch I am trying to check in a change that
involves a
>> soft symlink from Lib/controlled_importlib.py to
>> ../importlib/controlled_importlib
On 5/25/07, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/25/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my bcannon-objcap branch I am trying to check in a change that
involves a
> soft symlink from Lib/controlled_importlib.py to
> ../importlib/controlled_importlib.py through ``ln -s
> ../co
Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> On 5/25/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In my bcannon-objcap branch I am trying to check in a change that involves a
>> soft symlink from Lib/controlled_importlib.py to
>> ../importlib/controlled_importlib.py through ``ln -s
>> ../controlled_importlib.py contr
On 5/25/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my bcannon-objcap branch I am trying to check in a change that involves a
> soft symlink from Lib/controlled_importlib.py to
> ../importlib/controlled_importlib.py through ``ln -s
> ../controlled_importlib.py controlled_importlib.py`` while i
In my bcannon-objcap branch I am trying to check in a change that involves a
soft symlink from Lib/controlled_importlib.py to
../importlib/controlled_importlib.py through ``ln -s
../controlled_importlib.py controlled_importlib.py`` while in the Lib
directory. I have done this before in this branc
13 matches
Mail list logo