On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Andrew Svetlov
wrote:
> I thought my proposition is minor change, but if it's too late for 3.3
> — I'm ok.
Very simply, the first beta is when feature freeze goes into effect.
This is a really common policy that has been in effect for a long time
in CPython and m
I thought my proposition is minor change, but if it's too late for 3.3
— I'm ok.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:39:15 +0300
> Andrew Svetlov wrote:
>> Ok.
>> Sorry for my mistake — there are really no commits for
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue154
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:39:15 +0300
Andrew Svetlov wrote:
> Ok.
> Sorry for my mistake — there are really no commits for
> http://bugs.python.org/issue15417
> It's look important for me — but you are release manager.
> If you consider the patch as potentially dangerous — I have to agree with you.
>
Ok.
Sorry for my mistake — there are really no commits for
http://bugs.python.org/issue15417
It's look important for me — but you are release manager.
If you consider the patch as potentially dangerous — I have to agree with you.
You are the master :)
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Georg Brandl
On 07/22/2012 06:10 PM, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
> Georg, sorry, I've committed it before you answered.
After you wrote that you'd wait three days... anyway, I can't find the
commit in the repository, so that's fine.
> If you want, I will revert it back.
> But, please, describe me why those scripts
Georg, sorry, I've committed it before you answered.
If you want, I will revert it back.
But, please, describe me why those scripts are to late for 3.3?
I strongly checked correctness of both activation script for fish and
csh/tsch shells.
Works fine.
It's not *new feature*, it is just extending
These are new features, please do not commit before 3.3 is released.
Georg
On 07/22/2012 02:12 AM, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
> I created http://bugs.python.org/issue15417 with required activation scripts.
> If there are no objections I like to commit it after, say, three days.
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 20
I created http://bugs.python.org/issue15417 with required activation scripts.
If there are no objections I like to commit it after, say, three days.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> On 07/19/2012 10:26 AM, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
>> virtualenv has virtualenv.csh and virtualenv.f
On 07/19/2012 10:26 AM, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
> virtualenv has virtualenv.csh and virtualenv.fish files.
> Is there any reason for restricting venv to bash/zsh only?
No. As far as I'm concerned, a patch to port the virtualenv csh and fish
activate scripts to pyvenv would be welcome (though I can't
virtualenv has virtualenv.csh and virtualenv.fish files.
Is there any reason for restricting venv to bash/zsh only?
--
Thanks,
Andrew Svetlov
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscrib
10 matches
Mail list logo