On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> To avoid losing these ideas, could you add them to the issue tracker as
> feature requests? It's too late to get them into 2.6/3.0 but they may make
> good additions for the next release cycle.
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:14 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I didn't see any recent discussion about this so I thought I'd ask
>> here: do you think this would make a good addition to the new urllib
>> package?
>
> Just in case that isn't clear: any such change must be delayed
> I didn't see any recent discussion about this so I thought I'd ask
> here: do you think this would make a good addition to the new urllib
> package?
Just in case that isn't clear: any such change must be delayed for
2.7/3.1. That is not to say that you couldn't start implementing it
now, of cour
Chris AtLee wrote:
One thing I've always missed in urllib/urllib2 is the
facility to encode POST data as multipart/form-data.
I second that, having had to reinvent it a couple of
times recently. It seems like an obvious thing to want
to do, and it's surprising to find it's not supported.
--
Gr
Chris AtLee wrote:
Then we'd need to change either urllib or httplib to support iterable
objects in addition to the regular strings that it currently uses.
Chris,
To avoid losing these ideas, could you add them to the issue tracker as
feature requests? It's too late to get them into 2.6/3.0 b
All sounds reasonable to me.
Bill
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I notice that there is some work being done on urllib / urllib2 for
> >> python 2.6/3.0. One thing I've always missed in urllib/urllib2 is the
> >> facility to encode POST data as m
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I notice that there is some work being done on urllib / urllib2 for
>> python 2.6/3.0. One thing I've always missed in urllib/urllib2 is the
>> facility to encode POST data as multipart/form-data. I think it would
>> als
> I notice that there is some work being done on urllib / urllib2 for
> python 2.6/3.0. One thing I've always missed in urllib/urllib2 is the
> facility to encode POST data as multipart/form-data. I think it would
> also be useful to be able to stream a POST request to the remote
> server rather
Hello,
I notice that there is some work being done on urllib / urllib2 for
python 2.6/3.0. One thing I've always missed in urllib/urllib2 is the
facility to encode POST data as multipart/form-data. I think it would
also be useful to be able to stream a POST request to the remote
server rather th
