On Aug 14, 2008, at 8:13 AM, Olemis Lang wrote:
What I do think is that we need a mail list (or equivalent) dedicated
to discuss such things... because (again IMO) python-dev might not be
It's not, but this list is the right place:
http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python
-Fred
> >
> > > The goal
> > > should be to produce something like a unittest-ng, distribute it via
> > > the Cheeseshop, and gather consensus around it for possible inclusion
> > > in Python 2.7/3.1.
> > >
> >
IMO test support in Python needs some enhancements. I also think there
are great libraries av
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
[...]
nose itself is not a completely independent piece of work but "a discovery-based
unittest extension" (although a very big extension!). For that reason, Michael
Foord's suggestion to gradually modernize and improve the stdlib unittest sounds
reasona
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:35:15 + (UTC), Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Barry Warsaw python.org> writes:
The goal
should be to produce something like a unittest-ng, distribute it via
the Cheeseshop, and gather consensus around it for possible inclusion
in Python 2.7/3.1.
There is
Barry Warsaw python.org> writes:
> The goal
> should be to produce something like a unittest-ng, distribute it via
> the Cheeseshop, and gather consensus around it for possible inclusion
> in Python 2.7/3.1.
There is already unittest, nose, py.test, trial... perhaps others I don't know
of.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 12, 2008, at 11:13 AM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
I'll forward this idea on to testing-in-python:
http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python
where there was another bikeshed discussion about testing, a few weeks
ago. That might b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 12, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
A SIG might be a good idea. There's also already the "testing in
python"
list, too:
http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python
A lot of this discussion would be appropriate there.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:05:57AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
-> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-> Hash: SHA1
->
-> On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
->
-> >[I just saw the other post about unit testing, while I was writing
-> >this.
-> >A strange conincidence.]
->
-> I
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:05:57 -0400, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
[I just saw the other post about unit testing, while I was writing this.
A strange conincidence.]
Indeed. I've play
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
[I just saw the other post about unit testing, while I was writing
this.
A strange conincidence.]
Indeed. I've played around (again) recently with both nose and
py.test, so I'd like to mak
[I just saw the other post about unit testing, while I was writing this.
A strange conincidence.]
Hello,
since this is the first time I post to this list, I'd like to introduce
myself briefly. As you can see my name is Sebastian. I am working as a
software developer both as a professional and as
11 matches
Mail list logo
