Re: [Python-Dev] unittest's redundant assertions: assertsvs. failIf/Unlesses

2008-04-09 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:47 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > > I think, however, that the docs should be revised now, for 2.6/3.0. > > In the list of methods under TestCase Objects, the preferred method > > of each > > pair (or tripli

Re: [Python-Dev] unittest's redundant assertions: assertsvs. failIf/Unlesses

2008-04-08 Thread Fred Drake
On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:47 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > I think, however, that the docs should be revised now, for 2.6/3.0. > In the list of methods under TestCase Objects, the preferred method > of each > pair (or triplit) should be given first and the others marked as > future > deprecations, not r

Re: [Python-Dev] unittest's redundant assertions: assertsvs. failIf/Unlesses

2008-04-08 Thread Terry Reedy
"Michael Foord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | > Someone please open a bug for this task. | > | > | This sounds like a good compromise and I'm happy to take on the cleanup | - unless someone else beats me to it. I guess it should wait until 3.0 | final is out of the