On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Brett Cannon python.org> writes:
>
>> If there is something missing from the stdlib discussion that you think
>> should
> be brought up at the summit let me know. And if there is something here you
> want
> to discuss before the summit let m
Brett Cannon python.org> writes:
> If there is something missing from the stdlib discussion that you think should
be brought up at the summit let me know. And if there is something here you want
to discuss before the summit let me know and I can start a separate thread on
it.
I'm sorry I won't
> I think it would be interesting to see how people are using the tracker,
> or how they want to be using it. For example, there are currently over
> 1500 open issues with no stage set, some of which seemingly haven't been
> read by anyone at all. Would a properly set stage field save issues from
>
Brett Cannon wrote:
> I expect there will be at least summary emails on what gets discussed.
> There is also a chance that it will be videotaped.
The Wiki makes for a better summary archive though.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:31, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:47:50 -0800, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:57, Brian Curtin
> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 14:25, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > >> * any changes needed to the issue tracker to help with the wor
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:47:50 -0800, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:57, Brian Curtin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 14:25, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >> * any changes needed to the issue tracker to help with the workflow?
> >> (stage field seems like a failed experiment and we no
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:57, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 14:25, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> * any changes needed to the issue tracker to help with the workflow?
>> (stage field seems like a failed experiment and we now have several
>> effective triage people who can help w/ gui
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:09, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
> > Michael has given me the hg transition/stdlib time slot at the language
> > summit this year. In regards to that I plan to lead a discussion on:
> >
> > * where we are at w/ the Hg transition (Dirkjan should be there an
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:10:14 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> There are actually a whole host of reasons issues can stagnate:
> - a feature request may seem reasonable (hence it doesn't get rejected
> outright), but the right API may not be clear (hence it doesn't get
> implemented in the near term)
>
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 04:20, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:57:46 -0600, Brian Curtin a écrit :
> >
> > For example, there are currently over
> > 1500 open issues with no stage set, some of which seemingly haven't been
> > read by anyone at all.
>
> I think most issues /have/ be
Brett Cannon wrote:
> Michael has given me the hg transition/stdlib time slot at the language
> summit this year. In regards to that I plan to lead a discussion on:
>
> * where we are at w/ the Hg transition (Dirkjan should be there and I did a
> blog post on this topic recently:
> http://sayspy.b
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:57:46 -0600, Brian Curtin a écrit :
>> For example, there are currently over
>> 1500 open issues with no stage set, some of which seemingly haven't been
>> read by anyone at all.
>
> I think most issues /have/ been read. It's just that for many of the
Le Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:20:27 +, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
>
> I don't think this has anything to do with properly setting the stage
> field. We just have limited time and manpower. Perhaps one of our goals
> should be to reach out more to potential contributors.
Speaking of which, Steve had so
Le Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:57:46 -0600, Brian Curtin a écrit :
>
> For example, there are currently over
> 1500 open issues with no stage set, some of which seemingly haven't been
> read by anyone at all.
I think most issues /have/ been read. It's just that for many of them,
nobody is interested eno
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 14:25, Brett Cannon wrote:
> * any changes needed to the issue tracker to help with the workflow? (stage
> field seems like a failed experiment and we now have several effective
> triage people who can help w/ guiding changes)
>
> -Brett
>
I think it would be interesting t
On 10/01/2010 21:52, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 21:25, Brett Cannon wrote:
Michael has given me the hg transition/stdlib time slot at the language
summit this year. In regards to that I plan to lead a discussion on:
* where we are at w/ the Hg transition (Dirkjan should
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 21:25, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Michael has given me the hg transition/stdlib time slot at the language
> summit this year. In regards to that I plan to lead a discussion on:
> * where we are at w/ the Hg transition (Dirkjan should be there and I did a
> blog post on this topi
Michael has given me the hg transition/stdlib time slot at the language
summit this year. In regards to that I plan to lead a discussion on:
* where we are at w/ the Hg transition (Dirkjan should be there and I did a
blog post on this topic recently:
http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2010/01/where-hg-tra
18 matches
Mail list logo
