"Phillip J. Eby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 01:17 PM 1/20/2007, Josiah Carlson wrote:
>
> >Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[snip]
> > > It's not a question, it's a critique. I believe this is a misfeature
> > > since
> > > it's so easy to make this mistake.
> >
> >And it is go
At 01:17 PM 1/20/2007, Josiah Carlson wrote:
>Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[snip]
> > It's not a question, it's a critique. I believe this is a misfeature since
> > it's so easy to make this mistake.
>
>And it is going away with Py3k. Making it go away for Python 2.6 would
>either all
On Sunday 21 January 2007 05:17, Josiah Carlson wrote:
> Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > It's not a question, it's a critique. I believe this is a
> > misfeature since it's so easy to make this mistake.
>
> And it is going away with Py3k. Making it go away for Python 2.6
> w
Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> It's not a question, it's a critique. I believe this is a misfeature since
> it's so easy to make this mistake.
And it is going away with Py3k. Making it go away for Python 2.6 would
either allow for two syntaxes to do the same thing, or would req
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Neal Becker schrieb:
>> I accidentally wrote:
>>
>> try:
>> ...
>> except a,b:
>>
>> rather than:
>>
>> try
>> ...
>> except (a,b):
>>
>> It appears that the 1st example syntax is silently accepted, but doesn't
>> seem to work. Is this true? If so, I'd say it's a wart
Neal Becker schrieb:
> I accidentally wrote:
>
> try:
> ...
> except a,b:
>
> rather than:
>
> try
> ...
> except (a,b):
>
> It appears that the 1st example syntax is silently accepted, but doesn't
> seem to work. Is this true? If so, I'd say it's a wart.
Both have a meaning: The first ass
I accidentally wrote:
try:
...
except a,b:
rather than:
try
...
except (a,b):
It appears that the 1st example syntax is silently accepted, but doesn't
seem to work. Is this true? If so, I'd say it's a wart.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@
