On 5/24/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> > so, which one is correct ?
> >
> > Python 2.4.3
> > >>> "".replace("", "a")
> > ''
> > >>> u"".replace(u"", u"a")
> > u'a'
>
> Probably there shouldn't be any "correct" in this case,
> i.e. the result of replacing an emp
[/F]
>> so, which one is correct ?
>>
>> Python 2.4.3
>> >>> "".replace("", "a")
>> ''
>> >>> u"".replace(u"", u"a")
>> u'a'
[Greg Ewing]
> Probably there shouldn't be any "correct" in this case,
> i.e. the result of replacing an empty string should be
> undefined (because any string contains in
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> so, which one is correct ?
>
> Python 2.4.3
> >>> "".replace("", "a")
> ''
> >>> u"".replace(u"", u"a")
> u'a'
Probably there shouldn't be any "correct" in this case,
i.e. the result of replacing an empty string should be
undefined (because any string contains infinitely
On 5/24/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so, which one is correct ?
>
> Python 2.4.3
> >>> "".replace("", "a")
> ''
> >>> u"".replace(u"", u"a")
> u'a'
Since 'x'.replace('', 'a') and u'x'.replace('', u'a') return 'axa' and
u'axa', respectively, I conclude that the unicode version i
so, which one is correct ?
Python 2.4.3
>>> "".replace("", "a")
''
>>> u"".replace(u"", u"a")
u'a'
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/opti
