> I see. So if people want to analyze python code they have to use
> other tools (like rope?) ? or use reflection ?
Correct. One such tool might be the true Python compiler, along
with the _ast module.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-
On Jan 7, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> astgen.py is not used to process asdl files; ast.txt lives right
>>> next to astgen.py. Instead, the asdl file is processed by
>>> Parser/asdl_c.py.
>>
>> Yes, I know that. That's why I asked about the relation between
>> ast.txt and Python.
>> astgen.py is not used to process asdl files; ast.txt lives right
>> next to astgen.py. Instead, the asdl file is processed by
>> Parser/asdl_c.py.
>
> Yes, I know that. That's why I asked about the relation between
> ast.txt and Python.adsl. If internally the parser uses the .adsl, but
> expose
On Jan 7, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> I would like to use astgen.py to generate python classes corresponding to
>> the
>> AST of something I have defined in a .asdl file, along the line of what is
>> apparently done for the python AST itself. I thought astgen.py would
>> take a
> I would like to use astgen.py to generate python classes corresponding to the
> AST of something I have defined in a .asdl file, along the line of what is
> apparently done for the python AST itself. I thought astgen.py would
> take as an argument a .asdl file, but apparently it instead process
Hi,
I would like to use astgen.py to generate python classes corresponding to the
AST of something I have defined in a .asdl file, along the line of what is
apparently done for the python AST itself. I thought astgen.py would
take as an argument a .asdl file, but apparently it instead process a f
