Re: [Python-Dev] refleaks & test_tcl & threads

2006-04-17 Thread Tim Peters
[Thomas Wouters] > ... > One remaining issue with refleakhunting on my machine is that test_tcl can't > stand being run twice. Even without -R, this makes Python hang while waiting > for a mutex in the second run through test_tcl: > > ...trunk $ ./python -E -tt Lib/test/regrtest test_tcl test_tcl >

Re: [Python-Dev] refleaks & test_tcl & threads

2006-04-17 Thread Tim Peters
[Thomas Wouters] >> test_threading_local is not entirely consistent, but it looks a lot more >> reliable on my box than on Neal's automated mails: >> >> test_threading_local >> beginning 11 repetitions >> 12345678901 >> ... >> test_threading_local leaked [34, 34, 34, 34, 34, 26, 26, 22, 34]

Re: [Python-Dev] refleaks & test_tcl & threads

2006-04-16 Thread Thomas Wouters
On 4/16/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: test_threading_local is not entirely consistent, but it looks a lot more reliable on my box than on Neal's automated mails:test_threading_localbeginning 11 repetitions12345678901 ... test_threading_local leaked [34, 34, 34, 34, 34, 26, 2

[Python-Dev] refleaks & test_tcl & threads

2006-04-16 Thread Thomas Wouters
On my box, the latest batch of refleak fixes seems to have fixed all but one of the leaky tests. test_threading_local still leaks, but it leaks rather consistently now (which is new.) I'm not able to make the other ones leak with any combination of '-u' or removing .pyc's beforehand or running long