On 01.03.2011 14:45, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
>> All French core developers know I’m French too, but other people on this
>> list could have mistaken me, you’re right.
>
> I actually assumed it was something like that, but assumptions are
> deucedl
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
> All French core developers know I’m French too, but other people on this
> list could have mistaken me, you’re right.
I actually assumed it was something like that, but assumptions are
deucedly dangerous things with an annoying habit of biting
> Remember there's no tone of voice, facial expressions or body language
> on the internet
This linguist approves.
> smileys are your friend when kidding around :)
All French core developers know I’m French too, but other people on this
list could have mistaken me, you’re right.
Cheers
__
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Éric Araujo wrote:
>> I really meant superfetatory
>
> Those damn French people with their foreign words.
Remember there's no tone of voice, facial expressions or body language
on the internet - smileys are your friend when kidding around :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nic
> I really meant superfetatory
Those damn French people with their foreign words.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 13:56 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
2011/2/28 Antoine Pitrou :
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:36:11 -0500
Terry Reedy wrote:
+ an existing branch. The pusher then has to merge the superfetatory heads
'superfetatory'? I have no idea of what this
On Feb 28, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On 28.02.2011 20:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 13:56 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
>>> 2011/2/28 Antoine Pitrou :
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:36:11 -0500
Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>> + an existing branch
On 28.02.2011 20:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 13:56 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
>> 2011/2/28 Antoine Pitrou :
>> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:36:11 -0500
>> > Terry Reedy wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > + an existing branch. The pusher then has to merge the superfetatory
>> >>
2011/2/28 Antoine Pitrou :
> Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 13:56 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
>> 2011/2/28 Antoine Pitrou :
>> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:36:11 -0500
>> > Terry Reedy wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > + an existing branch. The pusher then has to merge the superfetatory
>> >> > heads
>> >>
>
Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 13:56 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
> 2011/2/28 Antoine Pitrou :
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:36:11 -0500
> > Terry Reedy wrote:
> >>
> >> > + an existing branch. The pusher then has to merge the superfetatory
> >> > heads
> >>
> >> 'superfetatory'? I have no idea
2011/2/28 Antoine Pitrou :
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:36:11 -0500
> Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>> > + an existing branch. The pusher then has to merge the superfetatory
>> > heads
>>
>> 'superfetatory'? I have no idea of what this is, neither does
>> merriam-webster.com ;-).
>
> There are some Google
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:36:11 -0500
Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> > + an existing branch. The pusher then has to merge the superfetatory heads
>
> 'superfetatory'? I have no idea of what this is, neither does
> merriam-webster.com ;-).
There are some Google hits, though... Not sure if they are of pe
12 matches
Mail list logo