On 12:49 am, benja...@python.org wrote:
I should probably mark that PEP as abandoned or deferred, since for
various reasons, it seems like this is not what Python-dev feels is
needed [1].
Re-reading that thread, I see some good discussion about how to improve
the PEP, a little bit of misunders
I should probably mark that PEP as abandoned or deferred, since for
various reasons, it seems like this is not what Python-dev feels is
needed [1].
[1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-June/090121.html
2009/8/27 Brett Cannon :
> Is the PEP considering all non-private APIs public e
Is the PEP considering all non-private APIs public even if they are
not documented? If so we might want to be up front about that and say
so to make sure we are all very careful about making all non-essential
APIs private (assuming this PEP gets accepted).
And we might want to say that all code in
