> import sqlite3
> sqlite3.version
>> '2.6.0'
> sqlite3.sqlite_version
>> '3.7.4'
>
> That's not intuitive. It is better to point sqlite3.version to the
> actual version of sqlite3 used.
We can’t break compatibility for such a small thing. However, it should
be documented in
http://d
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 2/9/2011 12:32 PM, s...@pobox.com wrote:
>>
>> Passing this along from webmaster.
>
> It is hard to reply to an attachment rather than inline forwarded message.
> However, with rc1
>
import sqlite3
sqlite3.version
> '2.6.0'
sq
On 2/9/2011 12:32 PM, s...@pobox.com wrote:
Passing this along from webmaster.
It is hard to reply to an attachment rather than inline forwarded
message. However, with rc1
>>> import sqlite3
>>> sqlite3.version
'2.6.0'
>>> sqlite3.sqlite_version
'3.7.4'
I added 'pysqlite' to the "What's ne
Passing this along from webmaster.
S
--- Begin Message ---
Not sure who to address this question to. Would you please forward it as
you feel is appropriate?
The python 3.2 release notes say that it compiles against sqlite "2.6".
Does that mean it includes the pysqlite 2.6 module which links
