On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 13:40 Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> On 10.04.2016 16:51, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On 10 April 2016 at 15:07, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> >> If there's some agreement to change things with respect to those 5
> points, I
> >> am willing to put some time into it.
> > In broad terms I agree
On 10.04.2016 16:51, Paul Moore wrote:
On 10 April 2016 at 15:07, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
If there's some agreement to change things with respect to those 5 points, I
am willing to put some time into it.
In broad terms I agree with these points. Thanks for doing the
research. It would certainly b
On 10 April 2016 at 15:07, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> If there's some agreement to change things with respect to those 5 points, I
> am willing to put some time into it.
In broad terms I agree with these points. Thanks for doing the
research. It would certainly be good to try to improve pathlib based
I talked to my colleague. He didn't remember the concrete use-case,
though, he instantly mentioned three possible things (no order of
preference):
1) pathlib + mtime
2) os.walk and pathlib
3) creation/removal of paths
He wasn't too sure but I checked with the docs and his memories seemed
to b
