Re: [Python-Dev] patch #1454481 vs buildbot

2006-06-05 Thread Andrew MacIntyre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Andrew, look in your mail for a patch file. Received, thanks. Andrew. - Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..." E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (pref) | Snail: PO Box 3

Re: [Python-Dev] patch #1454481 vs buildbot

2006-06-05 Thread Andrew MacIntyre
Tim Peters wrote: > #if THREAD_STACK_MIN < PTHREAD_STACK_MIN > > assumes that the expansion of PTHREAD_STACK_MIN acts like a > compile-time constant expression, but there's no such guarantee. > >http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/head/limits.h > > shows that, on one version o

Re: [Python-Dev] patch #1454481 vs buildbot

2006-06-04 Thread skip
Tim> Until all this gets resolved, I strongly suggest reverting this Tim> patch ... So I won't check in changes to suppress compilation warnings on my Mac. Andrew, look in your mail for a patch file. Skip ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-De

Re: [Python-Dev] patch #1454481 vs buildbot

2006-06-04 Thread Tim Peters
[Andrew MacIntyre] > In reviewing the buildbot logs after committing this patch, I see 2 > issues arising that I need advice about... > > 1. The Solaris build failure in thread.c has me mystified as I can't > find any "_sysconf" symbol - is this in a system header? The patch's #if THREAD_STACK_M

[Python-Dev] patch #1454481 vs buildbot

2006-06-04 Thread Andrew MacIntyre
In reviewing the buildbot logs after committing this patch, I see 2 issues arising that I need advice about... 1. The Solaris build failure in thread.c has me mystified as I can't find any "_sysconf" symbol - is this in a system header? 2. I don't know what to make of the failure of test_thread