On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Matthieu Bec wrote:
> Regarding your example, I think it gives the illusion to work because
> sleep() is GIL aware under the hood.
>
>
It'll work for anything -- it just may not buy you any performance.
I don't know off the top of my head if file I/O captures th
Thank you, I'll take your advice.
Regarding your example, I think it gives the illusion to work because
sleep() is GIL aware under the hood.
I don't think it works for process() that mainly runs bytecode, because
of the GIL.
Sorry if I wrongly thought that was a language level discussion.
This really isn't the place to ask this kind of question.
If you want to know how to do something with python, try python-users ,
stack overflow, etc.
If you have an idea about a new feature you think python could have, then
the python-ideas list is the place for that. But if you want anyone to t
There are times when you deal with completely independent input/output
'pipes' - where parallelizing would really help speed things up.
Can't there be a way to capture that idiom and multi thread it in the
language itself?
Example:
loop:
read an XML
produce a JSON like
Regards,
