On Sep 22, 2005, at 8:58 PM, Trent Mick wrote:
> [richard barran wrote]
>
>> So I have a question: do the previous mails mean that a relpath
>> function might possibly be a usefull addition to os.path?
>>
>
> Yes, it seems to have support.
I'd like to throw in another late +1 here, I've written
[richard barran wrote]
> So I have a question: do the previous mails mean that a relpath
> function might possibly be a usefull addition to os.path?
Yes, it seems to have support.
> And if the answer to the previous question is "yes", then should I
> submit a patch, or is someone else already
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, John J Lee wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Greg Ewing wrote:
>
> > Trent Mick wrote:
> >
> > > If this *does* get added (I'm +0) then let's call it "relpath" or
> > > "relpathto" as in the various implementations out there:
> >
> > +1 on that, too. Preferably just "re
