> > Yes, there has been quite a bit of interest including several ASPN
> > recipes and a wiki:
> >
> >http://www.python.org/moin/PythonDecoratorLibrary
>
> Thanks, I didn't know about that page. BTW, I notice that all the
> decorators
> in that page are improper, in the sense that they change
On 5/5/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, there has been quite a bit of interest including several ASPN
> recipes and a wiki:
>
>http://www.python.org/moin/PythonDecoratorLibrary
Thanks, I didn't know about that page. BTW, I notice that all the decorators
in that page
> > Ultimately, some of these will likely end-up in the library. For
the
> > time being, I think it best that these get posted and evolve either
as
> > Wiki entries or as ASPN entries. The best practices and proven
winners
> > have yet to emerge. Solidifying first attempts is likely not a good
>
> Are there plans to improve decorators support in future Python
versions?
> By "improving decorator support" I mean for instance a module in the
> standard
> library providing some commonly used decorators such as ``memoize``,
> or utilities to create and compose decorators, and things like that.
My first post to python-dev, but I guess my name is not completely unknown
in this list ;)
Actually, I have been wondering about subscribing to python-dev for at least
a couple of years, but never did it, because of the limited amount of time
I have to follow all the interesting mailing lists in
