Matthias Klose wrote:
[No, I'm not interested in the port myself]
patches for a mingw32 port are floating around on the web and the python bug
tracker, although most of them as a set of patches in one issue addressing
several things, and which maybe outdated for the trunk. at least for me
re-rea
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:49:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> So ok to close issue16526, issue3871, issue3754 and suggest in the reports to
> start over with more granular changes?
+1 from me. Over time I've suggested to at least two people, maybe
more, who wanted to see some action on these that
[No, I'm not interested in the port myself]
patches for a mingw32 port are floating around on the web and the python bug
tracker, although most of them as a set of patches in one issue addressing
several things, and which maybe outdated for the trunk. at least for me
re-reading a big patch in a ne
