On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:47 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> As Jesse has said, there is an RFP in development to improve
>>> python.org to the point where we can self-host blogs and the like and
>>> deal with the associated user account adm
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:47 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> As Jesse has said, there is an RFP in development to improve
>> python.org to the point where we can self-host blogs and the like and
>> deal with the associated user account administration appropriately.
>
> To run a blog on www.python.
On May 20, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> As Jesse has said, there is an RFP in development to improve
>> python.org to the point where we can self-host blogs and the like and
>> deal with the associated user account administration appropriately.
>
> To run a blog on www.python.org,
> As Jesse has said, there is an RFP in development to improve
> python.org to the point where we can self-host blogs and the like and
> deal with the associated user account administration appropriately.
To run a blog on www.python.org, a PEP is not needed. If anybody would
volunteer to set this
On 20.05.2011 17:35, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>> There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
>> python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
>> things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another "hosted by
>> someone else" site is probably not a good idea, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2011 11:35 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>> There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
>> python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
>> things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another "hosted by
>>
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>> There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
>> python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
>> things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another "hosted by
>> someone else" site is probably not a
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> Has the Python insider blog really accumulated enough history and
> cruft to make this move problematic? It's a fairly new blog, with not
> much content in it. From my blogging experience, Blogger has other
> limitations which eventually bite
> There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
> python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
> things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another "hosted by
> someone else" site is probably not a good idea, but our hands may be
> forced if google/blogger
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>>> With respect to Google Blogger, I don't see a good reason to use it as
>>> the platform for the blog.
>>
>> As with any infrastructure, there is a reasonably high cost in
>> changing, as people have become used to a certain way of doing thi
>> With respect to Google Blogger, I don't see a good reason to use it as
>> the platform for the blog.
>
> As with any infrastructure, there is a reasonably high cost in
> changing, as people have become used to a certain way of doing things,
> and porting the contents from the old system to the n
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 16:07, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Several of the PSF blogs hosted on Google's Blogger platform are
>> experiencing issues as fallout from the recent maintenance problems they
>> had. We have already had to recreate at
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 16:07, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Several of the PSF blogs hosted on Google's Blogger platform are experiencing
> issues as fallout from the recent maintenance problems they had. We have
> already had to recreate at least one of the translations for Python Insider
> in order
Several of the PSF blogs hosted on Google's Blogger platform are experiencing
issues as fallout from the recent maintenance problems they had. We have
already had to recreate at least one of the translations for Python Insider in
order to be able to publish to it, and now we can't edit posts on
14 matches
Mail list logo
