Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I've updated the patch on SF, and committed the fix (including PJE's and
> Neal's comments) to the trunk.
>
> I'll backport it tomorrow night (assuming I don't hear any objections in the
> meantime :).
I just wanted to thank you all for taking the time to work on this, even
Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Good point. I modified the patch so it does the latter (it only calls
>> getabspath() again for a module if the value of module.__file__ changes).
>
> with _filesbymodname[modname] = file changed to _filesbymodname[modname]
> = f
> it seems to work ok
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Ralf Schmitt wrote:
>> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>> It looks like the problem is the call to getabspath() in getmodule().
>>> This happens every time, even if the file name is already in the
>>> modulesbyfile cache. This calls os.path.abspath() and
>>> os.path.normpath() every t
Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> It looks like the problem is the call to getabspath() in getmodule().
>> This happens every time, even if the file name is already in the
>> modulesbyfile cache. This calls os.path.abspath() and
>> os.path.normpath() every time that inspect.findsou
Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> It looks like the problem is the call to getabspath() in getmodule(). This
> happens every time, even if the file name is already in the modulesbyfile
> cache. This calls os.path.abspath() and os.path.normpath() every time that
> inspect.findsource() is called.
>
> That
Ralf Schmitt wrote:
> The problem seems to originate from the module=getmodule(object) in
> findsource. If I outcomment that code (or rather do a module=None),
> things seem to be back as normal. (linecache.getlines has been called
> with a None module in python 2.4's inspect.py).
It looks like
Fernando Perez wrote:
>
> These enormous numbers of calls are the origin of the slowdown, and the more
> modules have been imported, the worse it gets.
--- /exp/lib/python2.5/inspect.py 2006-08-28 11:53:36.0 +0200
+++ inspect.py 2006-09-06 12:10:45.0 +0200
@@ -444,7 +444,8
Hi all,
I know that the 2.5 release is extremely close, so this will probably be
2.5.1 material. I discussed it briefly with Guido at scipy'06, and he
asked for some profile-based info, which I've only now had time to gather.
I hope this will be of some use, as I think the problem is rather seri
