On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:14:09 -0700
Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 09/06/2013 07:47 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> >
> > Are you suggesting that inspect.getmro(A) would return (A, object,
> > type)? That seems very wrong to me.
>
> Currently, `inspect.getmro(A)` returns `(A, object)`.
>
> Considering that Py
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:01:32 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 09/06/2013 09:37 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:59:02 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
> >>
> >> For the short term I can restrict the change to
> >> inspect.classify_class_attrs().
> >
> > Sounds like the best course.
On 09/06/2013 09:37 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:59:02 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
For the short term I can restrict the change to inspect.classify_class_attrs().
Sounds like the best course.
There is one other function in inspect that calls getmro():
def getmembers(ob
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:59:02 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 09/06/2013 08:44 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:14:09 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
> >> On 09/06/2013 07:47 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are you suggesting that inspect.getmro(A) would return (A, object,
> >>>
On 09/06/2013 08:44 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:14:09 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 09/06/2013 07:47 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Are you suggesting that inspect.getmro(A) would return (A, object,
type)? That seems very wrong to me.
Currently, `inspect.getmro(A)` returns `(A
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:14:09 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 09/06/2013 07:47 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> >
> > Are you suggesting that inspect.getmro(A) would return (A, object,
> > type)? That seems very wrong to me.
>
> Currently, `inspect.getmro(A)` returns `(A, object)`.
Which matches A.__mro_
On 09/06/2013 07:47 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Are you suggesting that inspect.getmro(A) would return (A, object,
type)? That seems very wrong to me.
Currently, `inspect.getmro(A)` returns `(A, object)`.
Considering that Python actually will look in A's metaclass to find a class attribute, I thin
Hi Ethan,
Are you suggesting that inspect.get_mro(A) would return (A, object,
type)? That seems very wrong to me.
If the goal is to fix `inspect.classify_class_attrs()`, then this
function only needs a specific fix, along the lines of looking in
`get_mro(A) + get_mro(type(A))`. (A more minor is
Part of the fix for issue #18693 is to fix inspect to look in the metaclass for class attributes
(http://bugs.python.org/issue18929).
In inspect.py in function get_mro() we can either add the metaclass
unconditionally, or only if it is not 'type'.
If we add unconditionally, then help() adds t
