"tomer filiba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> why not add __enter__ and __exit__ to generator objects?
> it's really a trivial addition: __enter__ returns self, __exit__ calls
> close().
> it would be used to ensure close() is called when the generator is
> disposed, inste
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 04:56:15PM +0200, tomer filiba wrote:
>why not add __enter__ and __exit__ to generator objects?
>it's really a trivial addition: __enter__ returns self, __exit__ calls
>close().
>it would be used to ensure close() is called when the generator is
>disposed
why not add __enter__ and __exit__ to generator objects?
it's really a trivial addition: __enter__ returns self, __exit__ calls
close().
it would be used to ensure close() is called when the generator is disposed,
instead of doing that manually. typical usage would be:
with mygenerator() as g:
