Re: [Python-Dev] freeze build slave

2014-03-30 Thread Victor Stinner
I disagree. Running tests in debug code tests more things thanks to assertions, and provides more info in case of test failure or crash. Some assertions only fail on some platforms. See for example test_locale which fails with an assertion error on solaris (since Python 3.3). Adding one or two sla

Re: [Python-Dev] freeze build slave

2014-03-30 Thread Stefan Krah
"Martin v. L?wis" wrote: > C: pro: compared to B, build time is reduced (need only >to build once per branch); disk space is also reduced >con: it would test a debug build, not a release build It would be an option to run half of the Unix slaves (especially the ones with the more aggressi

Re: [Python-Dev] freeze build slave

2014-03-30 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 20:44:02 +0200 "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > I have created a buildbot configuration to test freeze. At the moment, > it has only one builder: > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/waterfall?show=AMD64%20Ubuntu%20LTS%20Freeze%203.x > > which currently fails as freeze doesn't actual

[Python-Dev] freeze build slave

2014-03-30 Thread Martin v. Löwis
I have created a buildbot configuration to test freeze. At the moment, it has only one builder: http://buildbot.python.org/all/waterfall?show=AMD64%20Ubuntu%20LTS%20Freeze%203.x which currently fails as freeze doesn't actually work. The test itself works by first building Python in release mode,