Nick Coghlan wrote:
> However, the scoping of for loop
> variables won't change, as the current behaviour is essential for search
> loops
> that use a break statement to terminate the loop when the item is found.
It occurs to me that there's a middle ground here:
leave the loop variable scope
Ben Wing wrote:
> apologies if this has been brought up on python-dev already.
>
> a suggestion i have, perhaps for python 3.0 since it may break some code
> (but imo it could go into 2.6 or 2.7 because the likely breakage would
> be very small, see below), is the elimination of the misfeature w
apologies if this has been brought up on python-dev already.
a suggestion i have, perhaps for python 3.0 since it may break some code
(but imo it could go into 2.6 or 2.7 because the likely breakage would
be very small, see below), is the elimination of the misfeature whereby
the iteration vari
