Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> >> Now, what is the lesser evil?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > IMO not showing the extraneous Nones is preferable.
>
> I agree (although I don't use pdb, so my view shouldn't be given too
> much weight...)
>
>
> I *do* use pdb a lot, and I agree that
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/9/16 Michael Foord :
> > Georg Brandl wrote:
> >>
> >> May I have a short vote on this issue:
> >>
> >> http://bugs.python.org/issue6903
> >>
> >> In short, pdb (since 2.6) uses a separate displayhook in order to avoid
> >> _ being reass
2009/9/16 Michael Foord :
> Georg Brandl wrote:
>>
>> May I have a short vote on this issue:
>>
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue6903
>>
>> In short, pdb (since 2.6) uses a separate displayhook in order to avoid
>> _ being reassigned (which screws up debugging apps that use _ as gettext).
>> In tha
Georg Brandl wrote:
May I have a short vote on this issue:
http://bugs.python.org/issue6903
In short, pdb (since 2.6) uses a separate displayhook in order to avoid
_ being reassigned (which screws up debugging apps that use _ as gettext).
In that displayhook, I did not add the suppression of
May I have a short vote on this issue:
http://bugs.python.org/issue6903
In short, pdb (since 2.6) uses a separate displayhook in order to avoid
_ being reassigned (which screws up debugging apps that use _ as gettext).
In that displayhook, I did not add the suppression of printing None, as
it
