2011/5/26 Terry Reedy :
> On 5/26/2011 2:08 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> Sorry to butt in here, but I agree with Eric that it was better
>> before. There is a common idiom, *pointer++ =, and
>> whenever you see that you know that you are appending something to an
>> output buffer. Perhaps the m
On 5/26/2011 2:08 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Sorry to butt in here, but I agree with Eric that it was better
before. There is a common idiom, *pointer++ =, and
whenever you see that you know that you are appending something to an
output buffer. Perhaps the most important idea here is that this
