Re: [Python-Dev] combined hg incoming patch

2011-03-08 Thread Martin v. Löwis
martin@mira:~/work/3k$ LANG=C hg -R tmp.bundle diff -r'ancestor(.,default)' -r default abort: unknown revision 'ancestor(.,default)'! It looks like that was fixed a week after 1.6.4 was released, here: http://hg.intevation.org/mercurial/crew/rev/2063d36b406e It should work in 1.7. Ah ok, it

Re: [Python-Dev] combined hg incoming patch

2011-03-08 Thread Brendan Cully
On 2011-03-08, at 1:03 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> Sorry, I didn't think that through. Revsets still have the power though: >> >> hg -R tmp.bundle diff -r'ancestor(.,default)' -r default >> >> (assuming your local repo is at the tip of default) > > I can't make this work. I'm using hg 1.6.4,

Re: [Python-Dev] combined hg incoming patch

2011-03-08 Thread Georg Brandl
On 08.03.2011 10:03, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> Sorry, I didn't think that through. Revsets still have the power though: >> >> hg -R tmp.bundle diff -r'ancestor(.,default)' -r default >> >> (assuming your local repo is at the tip of default) > > I can't make this work. I'm using hg 1.6.4, which d

Re: [Python-Dev] combined hg incoming patch

2011-03-08 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Sorry, I didn't think that through. Revsets still have the power though: hg -R tmp.bundle diff -r'ancestor(.,default)' -r default (assuming your local repo is at the tip of default) I can't make this work. I'm using hg 1.6.4, which does have revsets and (including ancestor). Still, with this c

Re: [Python-Dev] combined hg incoming patch

2011-03-07 Thread Brendan Cully
On 2011-03-07, at 2:30 PM, Brendan Cully wrote: > On 2011-03-07, at 2:18 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > >> Am 07.03.2011 23:09, schrieb Brendan Cully: >>> On 2011-03-07, at 1:03 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> I'd like to experiment with adding Rietveld support for reviewing remote reposi

Re: [Python-Dev] combined hg incoming patch

2011-03-07 Thread Brendan Cully
On 2011-03-07, at 2:18 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Am 07.03.2011 23:09, schrieb Brendan Cully: >> On 2011-03-07, at 1:03 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> >>> I'd like to experiment with adding Rietveld support for reviewing >>> remote repositories. For that, I'd need to create a single patch >>> (p

Re: [Python-Dev] combined hg incoming patch

2011-03-07 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 07.03.2011 23:09, schrieb Brendan Cully: On 2011-03-07, at 1:03 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: I'd like to experiment with adding Rietveld support for reviewing remote repositories. For that, I'd need to create a single patch (programmatically) that covers all incoming changes. 'hg incoming -p'

Re: [Python-Dev] combined hg incoming patch

2011-03-07 Thread Brendan Cully
On 2011-03-07, at 1:03 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > I'd like to experiment with adding Rietveld support for reviewing > remote repositories. For that, I'd need to create a single patch > (programmatically) that covers all incoming changes. 'hg incoming -p' > mostly works, but it may provide multip

[Python-Dev] combined hg incoming patch

2011-03-07 Thread Martin v. Löwis
I'd like to experiment with adding Rietveld support for reviewing remote repositories. For that, I'd need to create a single patch (programmatically) that covers all incoming changes. 'hg incoming -p' mostly works, but it may provide multiple patches for a single file, which I think would harm the